Tuesday, October 29, 2013

打房政策的利与弊

刚公佈的2014年度新財政预算案,四大打房措施是备受关注的焦点之一。
首相兼財长纳吉表示,这一系列的打房措施,是为了实现居者有其屋的目標及遏制炒楼活动,因为近年来的投机活动已造成房业价格持续走高,影响了人民的购屋能力。
打房措施將从2014年1月1日起生效,可以预见的是,城市地区如吉隆坡、新山和檳城的房屋市场將会因此放缓。站在老百姓的立场,这无疑是值得欢迎的;但对发展商和房屋仲介人而言,这却是个坏消息。
值得各方密切观察的是,在打房措施的阴影的笼罩下,未来半年的房產市场走势会怎样?房价飆升的现象会戛然而止,甚至急速往下调整吗?
一般的看法是,在短期內,不管是国內还是国外的投资者,都会採取更加谨慎的观望態度,以致一些特定地区如新山目前过热的的炒风暂时受到抑制。但发展商不会坐以待毙,他们將会在未来6个月的“冷静期”过后,根据新的形势,调整他们未来的房屋发展计划。
政府將拨出10亿令吉兴建8万个单位比市场价格便宜20%的“一马房屋”,以及与私人发展商联手打造22万3千间可负担房屋,可说是老百姓另一喜闻乐见的好消息。但所谓“一分钱一分货”,对整个房產市场来说,这些计划对抑制房价不一定有用。因为长远而言,真正影响房屋市场走势的还是需求的问题。如果发展商因为打房措施而放缓建屋计划,造成市场上的房產供不应求,则房產价格即使不再飆升,也不可能下降。
这一轮的打房政策,很大程度上是通过提高產业盈利税和提高外国人购屋价格的底限来达致,成也败也,还有待考验。有论者就认为,提高盈利税之举其实是一把“双刃刀”,未必有助於降低房价,反而会造成某些热点地区房价被进一步被推高。
无论如何,適当的降温措施是利多於弊的。但一些发展商的意见也值得政府深思,例如政府应该检討人民购买不起房屋的原因,而不是单向採取消极打房措施,给人朝令夕改的印象,不仅对房屋產业带来负面的影响,也打击了外资进军我国市场的信心。
星洲日报

Monday, October 28, 2013

Property sector measures in Budget 2014 hailed

Describing the proposals for the property sector as “apt, correct and measured”, property professionals said Budget 2014 will curb excessive speculation and help to solve affordability issues besetting the housing market.
In a post-budget commentary on Saturday, James Wong, the publicity chairman of the Association of Valuers, Property Managers, Estate Agents and Property Consultants in the Private Sector, Malaysia (PEPS), said the proposals, along with macro-prudential measures taken by Bank Negara, would stabilise and strengthen the market.
The proposed establishment of a National Housing Council and the provision of RM1bil in a public-private partnership to boost the affordable housing sector was much needed as previous measures were ineffective, Wong said.
“The affordable housing model has to be tweaked to include pre-fab housing, releasing more land by government agencies and increasing urban area density, particularly in places near transport terminals in order to average out land cost,” he said.
“It is not that private developers do not want to build affordable housing. Land prices have gone up too high in the Klang Valley, Penang and southern Johor. It is impossible for private developers to build homes priced between RM150,000 and RM450,000 in urban centres.
On the 30% tax on gains within the first three years of disposal in the proposed real property gains tax (RPGT) effective Jan 1, 2014, Wong said such measures in previous budgets for 2012 and 2013 were ineffective as an anti-speculation tool. The latest move would give RPGT more bite, he said.
“The budget promotes properties as a long-term investment, not something to be flipped to make short-term gains,” he said.
The Budget 2014 review of the RPGT has extended the quantum of increase from 15% within the first two years of disposal to 30% within the first three years of disposal. It has also re-imposed a prevailing 5% tax on companies and non-citizens in the sixth and subsequent years.
The new RPGT, and the removal of developers interest bearing scheme (DIBS) which enable buyers to pay a 5% or 10% downpayment with mortgage payments kicking in until the property is completed, would also stamp out bulk buying by foreigners, Wong said.
Although this would affect Iskandar Malaysia in southern Johor, over time the proposed measures would bring about confidence into that market as there had been “too much hype and speculation going on there”, he said.
The exemption of RPGT between 2007 and 2009 and the entry of DIBS in early 2009 created fertile ground for speculation. Home prices have increased by between 20% and 30% annually in urban centres, a situation PEPS president Lim Lian Hong said was “unhealthy” and needed to be corrected.
“Research by RAM (Ratings Agency Malaysia) into the past 50 years shows that a steady annual growth of 7% is healthy for the market,” said Lim, who is also the executive director of Raine & Horne International Zaki+Parners Sdn Bhd.
He said the property sector was an important part of Malaysia’s economy – or any other country for that matter – and that excessive speculation had a destabilising effect on the overall economy.
“The RPGT is an important anti-speculation tool, and with the removal of DIBS, we expect the market to self correct in the next six to 12 months,” Lim said, adding that affordable houses must be build as quickly as possible.
On the impact of the 6% goods and services tax (GST), buyers will try to complete transactions before April 1, 2015 when the GST is enforced. There may be a dearth of launches after the GST is in place.
He said the imposition of GST, the removal of DIBS and the RPGT must be considered in totality.
Although housing is GST-exempt, there will be an impact on house prices. At the same time, the RPGT will weed out speculative elements and remove the artificial element in the market.
A check with a developer showed that they have removed DIBS packages starting yesterday.
The developer will discuss with its bankers and lawyers as there is a lack of clarity when the scheme is prohibited. The move would not be retrospective, a marketing personnel said.
Separately, in a statement, C H Williams Talhar & Wong Sdn Bhd managing director Foo Gee Jen said it was “surprised at the quantum”.
Foo said he had reservations that foreigners had been discriminated against with a 30% RPGT imposed for all five years.
“Considering that foreign investments in Malaysian properties have been consistently encouraged, RPGT should have been equally applied to Malaysians and foreigners at the same rate.” he said.

2010年人口及房屋普查

根据2010年人口及房屋普查,估计今年的巫裔和土著,包括穆斯林和非穆斯林有1860万人(占总人口67.9%);华裔有660万人(24%)、印裔200万人(7.2%)、其他种族25万9000人(0.9%),这意味总人口有约2740万人。

2014年预算案产业盈利税

3年內脱售的房屋,产业盈利税增加至30%,在第4和第5年脱售的盈利税为20%和15%。

在第6年以后才脱售,若是本地公民则不会被徵收產业盈利税,公司则需
付5%的盈利税。

至於非公民,在首5年內脱售房屋需付30%的盈利税,由第6年开始,则需付5%盈利税。

外国人所能购买的房屋的最低价格,从原本的50万令吉,增加至100万令吉。

政府也將增加地產销售价格的透明度,发展商必需展示详细的销售价格包括所有提供给买家的好处和奖掖,如豁免律师费、印花税、买卖合同、现金回扣及免费礼品。

金融机构禁止提供最终的贷款给落实承担利息计划的发展商。

大马房价走势


政府推出的各项房屋计划

(一)房地部负责
●人民组屋(PPR)售价3万5千至4万2千
从2001年开始,房地部已经推出138项人民组屋计划(仅供出租)和供出售的计划,总共有9万2千630个单位。
截至9月30日,共有92项计划的6万9千零36个单位竣工,西马半岛售价3万5千令吉,东马则是4万2千令吉;而出租的单位则是124令吉。
●我的首间房屋(SRP)100%融资贷款免首期
2011年財政预算案宣佈这项计划,协助月入3千令吉以下的社会新鲜人拥有第一间房屋,可获得100%融资贷款以及无需10%首期。
2013年財政预算案则宣佈,从2013年1月1日起,申请者的月入提高至5千令吉,並且刪除一些条件。
从2011年至今年5月,共有1千410个申请提交给金融机构申请“我的首间房屋计划”,其中共有485个或总额7千250万令吉的申请获得批准,而当中的395个或总额6千130万令吉的申请成功获得担保。
(二)国家房屋有限公司(SPNB)负责
●可负担房屋计划(RMM)向州政府或县署登记
廉价、中低价和中价房屋的价格分別是3万5千令吉、5万令吉和8万令吉(西马),东马则是5万令吉、7万令吉和10万令吉,条件依各州政府而异。
凡21岁至50岁的大马公民、不曾拥有房屋或土地者、家庭月入不超过2千令吉即符合资格,有意购买廉价房屋者需向州政府登记,或邻近的县署登记。
兴建计划以3种不同形式进行,包括由一个大马人民房屋机构独自进行;一个大马人民房屋机构与私人发展商合作进行,以及私人发展商获得政府提供辅助基金(facilitation fund)进行。
2014年財政预算案宣佈,国家屋业发展有限公司將兴建1万5千122间为可负担房屋,此外,政府將扩大政府提供辅助基金的申请范围,即除了现有的一马房屋机构,也开放给私人发展商以申请高达40亿令吉的便利基金。
●简单拥有房屋计划(Skim Mudah Milik)
购屋只需250押金
国家房屋有限公司的所有房屋计划,开放让购屋者只需缴付250令吉的抵押金,在银行贷款批准前即可签署买卖合约。
此计划適用於已经工作许久、可以从公积金第二户头提款,且是首次购屋的购屋者,房屋类型包括中价、中低价、廉价房屋和10万令吉以下的房屋,仅限於住家单位,最多40万令吉,需是购屋者本身居住。
购屋者须是不超过35岁的大马公民、月入不超过5千令吉,联名贷款者的月入不超过1万令吉,可100%贷款,供期不超过35年、供期结束时购屋者不超过65岁。
●亲民房屋计划(RMR)助贫穷地主兴建房屋
此计划协助拥有土地的低收入者如渔夫、农夫和贫穷家庭在其土地上兴建房屋,屋价6万5千令吉,政府津贴2万令吉和2%的贷款利息。
2014年財政预算案宣佈,国家屋业发展有限公司將兴建8千间亲民房屋。
(三)一个马来西亚人民房屋机构
●一个马来西亚人民房屋计划(PRIMA)月入7500家庭可登记
於2012年开放让符合资格者申请登记,在这计划下每月家庭收入介於2千500令吉至7千500令吉个人或家庭(夫妻)可在网上登记,屋价介於10万至40万令吉之间。
一个大马人民房屋机构將分別在檳城兴建1万个单位、柔佛(2万5千个单位)和森美兰(1万1千个单位)房屋。
首期共在15个地点建造约2万间可负担房屋,目前已开始动工计划包括吉隆坡蕉赖首都镇(AlamDamai)、柔佛巴西古当及森美兰芙蓉。
申请条件除了必须符合月收入与所拥有的房產限制外,申请者也必须在有关房屋计划建设的区域工作或居住。
获拨10亿建8万房屋
2014年財政预算案中,政府宣佈“一马房屋计划”將获得10亿令吉拨款,准备兴建8万间价格比市价低20%的可负担房屋;国家房屋局(JPN)也將获得5亿7千800万令吉以推行该计划,兴建1万6千473单位的房屋。
“一马房屋计划”属於开放登记形式,只要符合条件就可以申请,而所有房屋抽选过程都会由独立稽查公司透明进行核查。
若申请者没抽中,名字会继续留在待抽籤名单中,以供参与下次公开抽籤。
(四)私人界可负担房屋计划(MyHome)
建中低价屋获津贴
2014年財政预算案宣佈,政府將推介私人可负担房屋计划(MyHome),以拨出3亿令吉鼓励私人领域建造更多中低价房屋。
该计划为私人发展商设下的条件包括:
-一项房屋计划內必须建造至少各20%的廉价屋和20%的中价屋,价格顶限分別为4万5千令吉和17万令吉。
-廉价屋的顶价为4万5千令吉,中价屋顶价为17万令吉。
-廉价屋的面积最少为800平方尺,中价屋至少1千平方尺(且要有至少3间睡房和2间厕所)。
-有关房屋计划必须备有停车场、祈祷室、礼堂和游乐场。
符合以上资格的私人发展商,將能从每一单位的廉价和中价房屋建设中,获得3万令吉津贴;另外,此计划在2014年里所津贴的房屋数量最多为1万间,优先给予那些在高需求地区兴建廉价和中价房屋的发展商。
申请方面,上述获得政府津贴的房屋仅供首次购屋者,且购买廉价屋的每月家庭收入不可超过3千令吉,而中价屋则是6千令吉。

Saturday, October 26, 2013

2014 预算案:產业措施

3年內脱售的房屋,产业盈利税增加至30%,在第4和第5年脱售的盈利税为20%和15%。

在第6年以后才脱售,若是本地公民则不会被徵收產业盈利税,公司则需
付5%的盈利税。

至於非公民,在首5年內脱售房屋需付30%的盈利税,由第6年开始,则需付5%盈利税。

外国人所能购买的房屋的最低价格,从原本的50万令吉,增加至100万令吉。

政府也將增加地產销售价格的透明度,发展商必需展示详细的销售价格包括所有提供给买家的好处和奖掖,如豁免律师费、印花税、买卖合同、现金回扣及免费礼品。

金融机构禁止提供最终的贷款给落实承担利息计划的发展商。

Friday, October 25, 2013

《2013年分层管理法令》(757法令)修改项目

发展商的权限

根据以下事项,发展商不能进行买卖(第3项,第6条文)

●发展商在呈交单位附表前,不得进行买卖
●倘若分阶段发展计划,必须分配临时单位面积予临时楼栋业主,一旦有任何修改也需出示
●在第4项第9条文下,发展商必须在管理发展期间,负责维修及管理財產发展商必须遵守事项,包括(第9(2)条文)
●发展商必须增加保养户头及储备金户头(Kumpulan Wang Penjelas)的存款
●购买保险
●遵守地方政府的指示
●管理业主的登记
●提供財务报告
●遵守地方法令
●进行任何適合及需要的维修及管理 发展商的权利(第4项,第9(3)条文)
●根据单位面积收取费用及储备金户头的存款
●批准有关维修及管理费用
●索回任何在地方政府指示下所使用的费用
●进行任何可能及需要的维修及管理 发展商的其他责任(第4项,第9 (3)条文)
●確保提供一个特別空间以作行政用途
●发展管理期限结束后,不得签署任何合约
●未收取及动用费用前,先在银行及金融 机构设立管理户头及储备金户头
●为未出售的单位缴付费用
●管理户头用於10(4)(c)(i)-(xiii)条文之用途;储备金户头用於11(4)(c)(i)—(iii)条文之用途
● 交出联合管理机构相关文件 发展商必须移交以下事项予居民联合管理委员会(第2项,第15(1)至(3)条文)
● 缴还开销后的剩款进行结转
● 行政办公室
● 已审核户口
● 发展区资產
● 维修及管理记录
● 所有发单、收据及支付凭证
● 已批准的规划
● 技术文件
● 合约
● 单位附表
● 承包商名字及地址
● 保修卡、手册、標准程序作业等
● 业主登记单位
● 保单

居民联合管委会(JMB)的权限

居民联合管理委员会的职责(第4项,第19至第26条文,附表2)

●在30天內为居民管理委员会进行登记
●遴选出联合管理机构(JMC)成员
●管理与开启储备金户头(KWP)
●整理財政预算案
●制定储备金户头(KWP)与收费
●制定延迟缴费的利息 ●购买保险
●制定与执行法律条规
●不超过两个月召开委员会会议
●举行常年大会
●遵守地方政府的指示与条规
●为单位业主进行登记
●准备经稽查的账目

业主的权限

业主或未来业主获取认证的权限(第5项,第73(a)至(f)条文)

●在第4项第2章第12条文下,买者必须付费用及储备金户头的存款
●在第4项第3章第25条文下,单位业主
(Pemunya Petak)必须缴付费用及储备金户头的存款
●在第5项第2章第52条文及第4章第68条文下,业主缴付费用及储备金户头的存款,而单位业主必须在接获通知信的14天內缴付有关费用,否则被罚每年不超过10%的利息

《2013年分层管理法令》(757法令)新措施

●主要是监管分层建筑或土地分配的维修及管理,以及发出分层地契的拥有权
●提供更详细的管理方针予居民联合管理委员会及管理机构
●2012年12月19日在国会通过,2013年2月8日在宪报上颁布,料將於2013年尾实行
●取代建筑及共同拥有財產(维修及管理)法令(663法令)与1985年分层地契法令(318法令)
●与2013年分层地契拥有权法令(修改)(A1450法令)一同实行居民联合管理委员会的职责(第4项,第21(2))
●根据单位股份收取费用
●收取储备金户头的费用
●允许行政与维修方面的开销
●遵守地方政府或政府相关公司发出的指示,並取回已付出的开销
●购买、租用或获取动產,作为共用的资產
●取得或安排服务,並共同管理与维修资產
●制定附加的法律条款
●进行任何合理及有必要维修与管理工作

保险
●务必为建筑物购买保险
●至少每5年1次,委託一名有註册的估价师针对建筑物的修復进行评估,建筑物的保险必须建立在修復价值的基础上
●所有购买保险的费用,必须充作重建、替代、修茸建筑物的用途
刑罚
●將原有10条错误行为(根据663法令第9条文及318法令第1条文)增加至35条,如逾期缴付费用、滥用单位作为寄宿单位或商业用途、在单位內饲养动物、破坏公共设施等
●违反757法令者,將被罚款至少5千令吉至50万令吉或监禁3年,或两者兼施

《2013年分層管理法令》(757法令)近期落实

《2013年分层管理法令》(757法令)预料将於近期内落实,届时吉隆坡市政局管辖区内的发展商、居民联合管理委员会、居民管理机构或业主作出违例行为,将受到更严厉的对付。

上述法令下已取代原有的《2007年建築与共同拥有财产(维修及管理)法令》(663法令)及《1985年分层地契法令》(318法令),而被施以的罚款也增加。

饲养动物会被罚款
在2007年建築与共同拥有财产(维修及管理)法令(663法令)下,一旦任何人犯下逾期缴付管理费、滥用单位作为寄宿单位或商业用途、在单位内饲养动物、破坏公共设施等总共10项违例行为,罚款是介於500令吉至10万令吉,一旦被控上庭及罪名成立,将面对监禁3个月或两者兼施的惩罚。

然而,在新的《2013年分层管理法令》(757法令)下,有关罚款将提高至介於5千令吉至50万令吉,同时一旦在法庭被判罪名成立,或将面对监禁3年,或两者兼施。

同样的,在新法令下,原有10项错误行为(根据663法令第9条文及318法令第1条文)已增加至35项。

《2013年分层管理法令》国会去年12月19日通过

截至2012年12月,我国有多达1万4千998个分层建築发展计划(不包括东马),并建有总共146万7千721个分层建築物住宅单位,而单单是吉隆坡,就已占了其中的5千个发展计划(30%)及约40万个单位。

截至2012年12月,我国有多达1万4千998个分层建筑发展计划(不包括东马),並建有总共146万7千721个分层建筑物住宅单位,而单单是吉隆坡,就已佔了其中的5千个发展计划(30%)及约40万个单位。

阿末菲沙披露上述时说,倘若以每个单位住了至少3名住户的方式计算,隆市住在分层建筑物內的人口就至少有120万人。

“由於吉隆坡人口日益增加,再加上高楼建筑物越来越多,因此市政局必须提高居民联合管理委员会及管理机构对於多层建筑的管理知识,以让管理层在处理事务时,能够更有效率,同时提供居民更优质的生活环境。”
也增加一些新措施

阿末菲沙指出,为了维护业主的权力及改善住户的居住环境,政府已於2012年12月19日在国会通过了《2013年分层管理法令》(757法令),並料將於近期內开始落实。

他指出,757法令的新增条文包括发展商在出售单位前,必须將单位附表(Jadual Petak)呈交予建筑物专员、管理层能够透过份层管理仲裁庭来处理分层地契及其他的投诉问题、说明有关单位面积(Unit Syer)的计算方式、只能委任1名代表,以及將原有10项错误行为(根据663法令第9条文及318法令第1条文)增加至35项。

“一旦实行新法令后,管理分层建筑的工作並不只是依靠建筑物专员、居民联合管理委员会及管理机构,而是连合所有业主的配合,以便打造更优质及和谐的环境。”

他说,建筑物专员也计划实行一些新的措施,包括为分层建筑物举办年度研討会、进行有关分层建筑物的管理及维修短期课程、介绍分层建筑財务管理的方针、提供有关常年大会及商討委员会职责的信息,以及对发展商、居民联合管理委员会、管理机构及业主施以惩罚。

JMB、MC及业主都必须遵守

为了打造一个有素质、舒適及和谐的居住环境,吉隆坡建筑物专员將落实分层建筑物財务管理的指南,规定居民联合管理委员会(JMB)、居民管理机构(MC)及业主都必须遵守,以便提昇管理层对分层建筑物的维修及財务管理技巧。

吉隆坡市长拿督斯里阿末菲沙指出,分层建筑物及综合发展计划是一项普遍被认同为永续发展的建筑模式,它已成为隆市目前的特徵。
他说,由於这些住宅单位的居民是共享设施,因此必须制定更完善的法令来管制,以保障居民的福利。

阿末菲沙今早出席2013年“多层建筑物管理研討会”时,如是表示。


Tuesday, October 22, 2013

席勒也戳不破的泡沫

2013年诺贝尔经济学奖的三位获奖者中,罗伯特•席勒(Robert Shiller)成功预测了2000年美国互联网泡沫破裂、2005-2007年美国楼市危机以及2008年全球金融海啸。这成为他获奖的重要砝码,也因此他备受中国国人关注,大家都希望席勒能够为中国楼市“诊脉”。但实际上,他对中国楼市的评论一直很谨慎。

几年前席勒曾表示,不论从房价收入比、房价租金比,还是从国际的横向比较和历史纵向比较看,中国楼市价格都处于相当高的水平。在今年6月的一次访谈中,他指出:中国等国家楼市急剧上涨,看起来存在泡沫。用“看起来”这样圆滑的话语,恰恰体现出他对中国楼市谨慎的一面。

当资产价格脱离基本面时,泡沫就会产生,而席勒认为,“是泡沫,就一定会破裂”。但审视今天中国楼市的“泡沫”,似乎没人能准确预测它破裂的时间。事实上,如果说目前中国楼市奇高的价格背后有其“合理性”,那么这就是一个“坚硬的泡沫”。

近些年,中国政府不断加码楼市调控,但是房价持续上涨。从市场需求推高房价,到行政干预进一步刺激房价,看似高房价的诱因在发生变化,但实际上,几点核心诱因没有改变。

一是高地价。中国“地王”频现,造房成本激增,房价怎能不高。中国政府更愿意扮演土地市场直接参与者的角色,而忽略其公共服务本色。

二是,地方债务高企。近年的地方债务问题,促使地方政府将土地出让金作为提款机。

三是,由于实体经济不景气,银行体系中大量资金流入房地产领域,潜在的金融风险巨大。

多年来,无数专家、学者看空中国楼市,但中国房价依然坚挺,除了上面提到的原因外,似乎中国政府从来就没想让楼市真正回归。从这个角度说,席勒的谨慎是对的。

也许不少人会认为席勒更像一位畅销书作家,但席勒证明了一点,即正确有效的经济观点,有时候并不一定需要通过繁杂的数学公式演绎,而通过漂亮、严谨的数学公式诠释的观点,往往都有致命的弱点。这一点,对于预测中国房地产市场,尤其适用。

诺奖得主与地产泡沫

上海交通大学高级金融学院副院长 朱宁

近期,笔者在耶鲁大学攻读金融学博士的导师罗伯特.席勒教授和另外两位金融学教授一起分享了2013年的诺贝尔经济学奖,表彰他们对于“资产定价实证分析方面”开创性的工作。

在资产定价领域,席勒教授有两个方面的贡献最为大家关注,那就是行为金融和房地产金融研究;而他对这两个领域的贡献和预测,又通过他对于美国2005-2007年房地产危机和之后的全球金融海啸的成功预测,获得了世人更为广泛的关注。

席勒教授总是谦虚地对我说,“我的想法是非常简单的”。早在上个世纪70、80年代,他就通过对美国股市估值水平在长期的巨大波动的分析,表示对当时主导金融研究的“有效市场假说”(Efficient Market Hypothesis,也正好是另外一位这次获奖的法码教授的主要得奖的贡献)的质疑。有效市场假说认为,因为证券价格可以迅速、全面、准确地体现市场中关于估计的信息,股票真正价值在短期内极难预测的,因而市场则是有效的。

但是席勒教授指出,在美国乃至其他各国股票市场的历史上,都经常出现市场估值水平常常可以在几年的时间里上涨200%,然后再下跌70%的巨幅波动的现象。而这种现象很难用所为的市场有效假说来解释,因为很难理解为什么投资者会对同一资产的估值,在这么短的时间里,给出这么不同的判断。

根据这种发现,席勒教授认为,人类的心理和决策过程中的“动物精神”,在很大程度上解释了为什么股票市场经常会出现泡沫和泡沫破裂的现象。他对于20世纪末美国互联网泡沫的准确预测,也给他赢得了“泡沫先生”的名誉。二十年过去了,席勒教授这一当时曾经孤独的质疑者,现在转而成为了经济学家思考的主流。

除了对于股票价格的研究之外,席勒教授对于资产定价的研究的很大一个方面,在于他对房地产这一重要资产类别的定价的研究。他是最早提出美国房地产市场之前常年使用的以新房售价计算房地产市场价格的方法的错误和局限性的学者(我国目前的房地产指数的编制也有同样的错误和缺陷,作者在之前的专栏“PM2.5与高房价”一文中有过详细的阐述)。

和大多数其他经济学教授不同的是,席勒教授对于房地产问题研究的好奇心和研究并没有止步于学术论文。他继而和另一位Wellesley学院的凯斯教授(Karl Case)一同并提出了以现有房屋重复销售价格编制指数并计算房地产价格的思路,并且从20年前开始开发美国的房地产指数。他们共同开发的凯斯-席勒指数(case-shillerindex)不但最终成为了在美国乃至全球房地产和金融市场都有重大影响力的数据,而且正是这一指数的历史走势,给予席勒教授强有力的信心来预测美国房地产市场2005-2007年的房地产泡沫。

根据他们对于美国一百多年房地产市场发展趋势的研究,席勒教授得出了一个惊人的发现。从长期历史数据来看,美国过去100年历史里的房价升值速度,只不过是和该国的通货膨胀速度相当。从这个意义上讲,抛开房地产的消费功能之外,房地产作为一种资产类别,并不一定像股票市场那样具有能带来跑赢通货膨胀超额收益有吸引力,也不值得投资者和居民大比例投资。

与此同时,他也提出,无论是房地产还是资本市场,一种资产的价格不可能长期偏离这一资产的长期平均收益水平,如果大幅超过的话,就会引发资产泡沫。正是基于他对于美国房地产价格和租金比例,和房地产价格和居民收入比例的历史数据的分析,席勒教授从2005年开始就认为美国房地产市场开始进入泡沫阶段。

这其中的趣事在于,席勒教授还在同一阶段还在离纽约不远的长岛海湾里购买一个小岛。因此有人借此批评席勒教授杞人忧天,言行不一。席勒教授理直气壮地回应说“购买那个小岛主要为了消费,当然,也有一部分原因是为了多元化我的资产组合,但这并不代表美国房地产市场没有泡沫!”言讫不久,美国房地产泡沫破裂,全球金融海啸来临,席勒教授的预测让他一时成为全球媒体的宠儿。

我们曾不止一次谈起过中国的房地产市场。席勒教授在几年前访问中国的时候就表明,中国的房地产价格,不论从房价对居民收入的比例、房价对房租的比例,国际的横向比较和历史的纵比较来看,都处于一个相当高的水平。至于房地产泡沫什么时候会破裂的问题,席勒教授说“必须承认,很少有泡沫是在我发现之后就马上破裂的,有的泡沫会持续很长时间,尤其是房地产泡沫,因为缺乏卖空机制、高额交易成本和资本流动限制,房地产泡沫往往会持续很长时间”。但是最终,在这个问题上,我们师徒两人都有一个简单的信念,那就是“是泡沫,就一定会破裂的”。

席勒教授对泡沫的研究,不只局限在书斋里,而是在过去十年里以每两年一本新书的速度笔耕,并且在众多论坛和媒体活动上积极发言,希望能让自己的学术思想能根植在大众心中。在他看来,经济学家和金融学家的一个重要任务,就是要让全社会都能对经济和金融的运行有更清晰的了解和更科学的评价。

正是在导师的鼓励和督促下,笔者撰写了关于行为金融的新作《投资者的敌人》一书。在新书即将由中信出版社出版之际,席勒教授不但欣然为新书写了序言,而且还在序言中对我在“行为金融这一革命性的领域”的研究成果给予了高度的肯定。

即使是对于新书的书名,席勒教授和作者本人也多次写邮件进行探讨。席勒教授说“《投资者的敌人》简单明了而且引人思考,我看值得考虑,若果投资者都能知道自己的敌人是谁的话,经济里可能就不会有那么多泡沫了。”

Sunday, October 20, 2013

Raising property tax will push up house prices


Raising the real property gains tax (RPGT) and stamp duty could risk pushing house prices higher, according to HwangDBS Vickers Research.
This is because sellers would try to pass on incremental costs to buyers and delay disposal, leading to even tighter supply.
“We understand the Government needs to be seen to be actively reining in property speculation, but we do not advocate raising real RPGT, which has had a relatively short-lived impact in the past and could push house prices higher as sellers may pass on the incremental costs to buyers.
“It could also spur sellers to postpone disposal and developers to hold back launches in view of weaker sentiment, leading to even tighter supply in the market,” said the research house in a report yesterday.
Currently, RPGT is charged at 15% for disposal within two years and 10% for disposal within three to five years (compared with 5% to 30% prior to Budget 2010).
HwangDBS Vickers also noted that while raising stamp duty may have a bigger impact, sellers would also try to pass on the incremental costs to buyers.
“Any hike would not only affect new projects but also those under construction, especially strata-titled and projects under the master title which have yet to be transferred.”
The research house added that first and second home-buyers should be spared from any tightening measures, which would be in line with the Government’s aim to promote home ownership.
“Reducing the loan-to-value cap for a second property would affect genuine upgraders, who may find it challenging to pay a higher down-payment while waiting to sell their existing properties.
“This could reduce supply in both the secondary and primary markets, as developers may also delay launches due to poorer take-up.”
HwangDBS Vickers added that the Government should encourage the development of more international-class condominiums, such as those in KLCC and Bukit Bintang, to attract more foreigners.
“While other countries in the region are restricting foreigners from buying properties, Malaysia should conversely open up, as foreigners currently made up less than 5% of transaction volume (albeit rising marginally based on the Malaysia My Second Home applications).
“Property can be a new engine of growth for Malaysia in view of Iskandar Malaysia’s potential to leverage on Singapore and Greater Kuala Lumpur’s significance within the Economic Transformation Programme (which is targeting to attract 100 multi-national companies to set up operational headquarters in KL).”
HwangDBS Vickers also said that the potential introduction of the goods and services tax by 2015 could lead to lower personal and corporate tax rates.
“This should improve Malaysia’s competitiveness in attracting foreign direct investments and talent, along with stemming Malaysia’s brain drain and rising investments overseas by local corporates.”

Investors on hold pending budget


PROPERTY agents polled in the Klang Valley say Budget 2014 is expected to weigh considerably against investors. The more experienced investors are reading the signs around them and are taking a wait-and-see attitude while the braver ones are going ahead with their investment plans.
“Many may only make a decision post-budget,” says Peter, a senior negotiator who declined to be named.
Investors are concerned about the re-imposition of the real property gains tax (RPGT) in its full force. Of late, different media have delved into that possibility.
“Because property prices are so high today, there is the likelihood that this group of buyers will be targeted, as opposed to those buying for their own stay,” says an agent.
The situation in the property market today is different from before, Peter says, as investors have several issues to content with.
“Property investments are not as simple as before. The RPGT will be a deterrent, while the possible imposition of the goods and services tax (GST) may raise prices, which may induce those who do not yet own a property to just buy a unit,” says Peter.
The re-imposition of the RPGT and the entry of GST are not the only concern among the more experienced investors.
They are also concerned about the flat or falling rental market.
Peter says there was a time when investors bought into a project with a larger downpayment than currently on a progressive payment method and used the rental income to cover the full or partial monthly mortgage commitment. Today, that may not be possible because of the low downpayment, says Peter. The present developers interest bearing scheme has changed that.
“A one-room apartment in some locations may be more than RM600,000 today. At that price, he will only get a gross yield of 4% if he were to rent it out at RM2,000 a month and he has to pay for the various monthly charges.
“The days of using your rental income to cover your mortgage loan is over,” Peter says.
His comments are similar to another agent specialising in the Sri Hartamas/Mont’Kiara location in Kuala Lumpur.
She says rental has been trending down for several years.
“Most landlords are more accommodating and acceptable about reducing rental,” says Jenny.
She says the monthly rental for a 640 sq ft one bedroom unit used to be RM2,200-RM2,300 in 2011. This has gradually been reduced to RM2,000 today, a drop of 10% to 15%.
“There are more than 400 units in Plaza Damas 3 today. Some of the units were under a guaranteed scheme. Buyers who opted for this scheme had their units with a built-up of 500 sq ft rented out for RM3,000 a month. This amount includes car park, utilities and house keeping. If you remove these items, the rental is about RM2,500 to RM2,600 a month. With the end of these scheme, more units will be entering the market, putting new pressure on rental going forward,” she says.
The drop in rental is prevalent in most locations in the Klang Valley with the rental of larger units in Mont’Kiara facing a greater reduction.
“It is likely that rental may drop further,” she says, adding that returns have been trending downwards from 7% to 8% to 4%-5% today. It is likely to go down to 3% for condominium units.
“You cannot expect your rental to cover your monthly instalments,” she says, adding that much of this situation has to do with urbanisation. “We see this situation in Beijing, Shanghai and Singapore – part and parcel of the urbanisation process.”
The downtrend facing rental of condominium units is due to the supply entering the market.
Says Vincent Ng of Kim Realty: “Tenants stay in a place a year or two and move from the older ones to the newer block. This is prevalent in any location where there are multiple blocks coming up in a single location. The owner may refurbish his unit but the public areas are beyond his control.”
Ng says that while the one and two-bedroom units – with rentals between RM1,000 and RM2,000 – continue to be in demand even in the older blocks, it is the larger and older units that may face a problem in rental.
“There are so many new condominiums coming up and many of them have excellent facilities compared to the older ones,” says Ng.
However, Ng cautions that each location and project is different and has its own selling points. University Tower, located at the busy crossroads facing the University Malaya Medical Centre for example, enjoys good demand, despite not having the facilities or the ambience of the more modern contemporary units found in Mont’Kiara and Hartamas.
“Rental for University Tower is going up instead of going down,” says Ng. It is the only apartment block in that site. Oversupply will push down rental but that is not the case with University Tower because there is no other residential block within walking distance of the hospital.
An agent who declined to be named says North Point in Mid Valley used to be rented out at RM7,500-RM8,000 three years ago. “The last year, the landlord, a China national, instructed me to rent it out at RM6,000. There were no takers. He has just given new instructions to rent it out at RM4,000 a month. Ironically, people are willing to pay RM1.5mil for it, which is double the launching price,” says the agent.
Like the most fundamental of economic theory, when it comes to condominium rental, the theory of demand and supply applies, as with any goods and services.

Thursday, October 17, 2013

中美因素或造成金融市场受压 大马陷信贷泡沫危机

独立经济分析员杰斯哥伦布(Jesse Colombo)警告,大马国债和家债高企促成的信贷泡沫,很大可能在中国经济不振和升息环境下破灭。
他说,届时将重演1997年亚洲金融风暴。
警告或会萎靡不振
他周二在《福布斯》的专栏中,以题为“大马将因经济泡沫而萎靡不振”的文章,警示大马存有的信贷和产业泡沫危机。
哥伦布向来抱持反经济泡沫的立场,曾因自2004年初开始预测和预警美国次级房贷泡沫而获伦敦《泰晤士报》认可。
他说,自2008年次级房贷爆发后,大马经历显著的资本流入,在短短2年内推动令吉兑美元升值高达25%。
经济增长靠政府支撑
“外资在令吉面值债券的比例创下高点,海外直接投资也录得新高,更激励马股期间劲扬120点。”
但哥伦布强调,大马经济近年平均年增6%,很大程度来自政府和家庭信贷泡沫增长的支撑。
哥伦布担忧,当中国经济泡沫破灭,以及海内外利率持续调升的情况下,大马经济泡沫也将跟着破灭。
他补充,美联储逐步推出量化宽松政策,将在短期内造成大马金融市场受压,而出口疲弱造成来往账项盈余急速收窄,更是令人忧心忡忡的不良发展。
独立世代摩天楼成劳伦斯魔咒?
哥伦布指出,除了信贷泡沫,大马也存在着产业泡沫。
他更指118层楼高的独立世代(Warisan Merdeka),将是东南亚最高的建筑物,同时也是“摩天大楼指数(Skyscraper Index)”的警示。
摩天大楼指数又称劳伦斯魔咒,是由德意志银行分析员安德鲁劳伦斯提出的概念,经济衰退或股市萧条往往都发生在新高楼落成的前后。
大马人严重负债
宽松的政府政策及对经济乐观态度,经常鼓励大型工程的兴建。
然而,当过度投资与投机心理而起的泡沫即将危及经济时,政策也会转为紧缩以因应危机,使得摩天大楼的完工成为政策与经济转变的先声。
哥伦布表示,大马房产价格急剧扬升,平均每年增长30至40%,一些热点地区更劲扬50%,这也是为何大马家债快速增长的原因之一。
“大马人如今严重负债中,每月的债务偿还占收入的30%,汽车和信用卡债务更是大马破产主要原因。”

Wednesday, October 16, 2013

建议政府採取数项措施来抑制房市炒作


房价3年涨31%

房价涨不停,政府打房一刻不得閒,但分析员认为“一网打尽”的全面性措施成效不大,应放手让市场“看不见的手”展开一次调整机会,或透过更针对性的措施打房才可见到更显著的效果。

黄氏唯高达研究表示,在供不应求、新產业標高价格、成本走扬和宏观经济等因素影响下,过去3年大马產业价格已飆升31%,其中住宅產业在2012年创下678亿令吉和27万2千699单位的销售价值和数量新高。
產业盈利税影响短暂
成本转嫁房价涨更多
“有鑑於此,我们瞭解政府需要积极打击產业市场投机炒作活动,但我们並不主张提高產业盈利税(RPGT)应对,因这在过去只带来短暂影响,並可能使得卖家將额外增值成本转嫁至买家身上,进而让高涨的產业价格雪上加霜。”
此外,隨著RPGT上调,卖家可能推迟出售计划,而发展商也可能展延新產业推介,导致市场供需情况进一步失衡。
该证券行补充,就算提高印花税影响较大,但卖家一样可將成本转嫁至买家身上,而任何调幅不只会影响新工程,在建工程也同样受到牵连。
“因此,我们认为应给市场力量一次机会,主要是2014至2015年新供应有望加速,以及廉宜游资消失將影响需求走疲,將抑制產业价格上涨趋势,未来2至3年的年均增幅將减为3至5%。”
未来2至3年
销售减5至10%
受到国內生產总值(GDP)放缓和高通膨压缩可支配收入衝击,黄氏唯高达预见未来2至3年住宅產业销售將按年萎缩5至10%,其中住宅產业销售在今年首半年已出现走疲跡象,成交量按年下跌13%,而交易价值仅增长1%,连带拖累今年首季產业价格增速从去年的12%减速至6%。
不过,黄氏唯高达认为,市场力量固然可信,但並无“美好市场”存在,因此建议政府採取数项措施来抑制房市炒作,同时推广居者有其屋概念,其中包括:a)取消一手市场津贴,如可能纳入售价內的发展商承担利息计划(DIBS),同时要求银行更严格评估新產业价值,但放宽二手市场融资以帮助扩大市场供应基础,以及为国內產业市场重注活力。
b)加速可负担產业配套推介,为私人產业发展商提供透明津贴来共襄盛举。
同时学习新加坡建屋发展局(HDB)的完善政策、每人每次一户的执法行动,並落实特定地点售价上限措施。
c)市场细分:创造国际级公寓环节来吸引外国高財富人士和投资。
延迟新建
间接推涨房价
黄氏唯高达表示,隨著產业和大型基建工程纷纷动工,建筑週期高峰可能面对建材和外劳供应短缺的问题,进而使得发展商赚益受到影响,恐进一步导致新產业推介延迟,令產业售价持续飆升。
“但是,纵然產业价格走扬,我们认为在可负担能力依旧高企、家庭负债仍健康和廉宜游资將自行消散等因素支撑下,国內產业市场並未见泡沫化风险。”
不过,该证券行对租赁疲弱,以及空置率高企的吉隆坡办公市场发展感到忧虑,因吉隆坡市中心和週边地区在2016年杪前將新增21%或逾1千400万平方呎新办公空间,远超年均300万平方呎的平均出租率,市场面对更严峻的供过於求挑战。
在过去3年,新增供应已抑制吉隆坡办公空间出租率,其中市中心和週边地区出租率分別下挫12.4%和5.9%至81.6%和81.1%,因此相信部份政府再发展计划应延迟,以免加剧供过於求情况。
此外,黄氏唯高达也对多功能商务单位(SOFO)等混合型產业和依斯干达特区高档公寓潜在供过於求风险感到担心,因相关產业在过去2年大举面市,但实际自住需求並不踊跃。
马星实达
政策风险偏高
黄氏唯高达认为,受到政策风险、產业销售和价格增速趋疲等影响,產业市场前景將持续起伏不定,因此现金流吃紧、眾多在建工程、高土地成本,以及高度曝露在投机市场的產业发展商,如马星集团(MAHSING,8583,主板產业组)、实达集团(SPSETIA,8664,主板產业组)等將是最易受伤的一群。

Sunday, October 6, 2013

New completions in Greater KL

While the majority of new launches are in the suburban areas, there are also a number of upcoming new developments in the KLCC vicinity, including projects such as KL Trillion Serviced Apartments and Verve Suites @ KLCC among others.
The Mont’Kiara vicinity is also seeing an increase in new launches, with projects such as Pavilion Hilltop, Residensi 22 @ Mont’Kiara, Sun Kiara Condominium, Kiara 163 Serviced Residence, Weida Mont’Kiara and others to be launched in the near future.
During the review period, there were two new completions in Mont’Kiara – Kiaramas Danai (287 units) and 28 Mont’Kiara (460 units).
Knight Frank says the office market is expected to remain challenging as supply continues to outstrip demand.
In KL city, demand for good grade dual-compliant office space is expected to remain resilient in the short term. Owners of old and dated office buildings are proactively seeking to upgrade and enhance their assets in a bid to remain competitive and retain tenants (and to attract new ones) amid a challenging leasing market.
The decentralised office location of KL Sentral, however, is expected to face further pressure on its occupancy and rental rates due to the recent completion of some 1.9 million sq ft and impending completion of some 1.7 million sq ft by year-end.
The short-term threat from these completions may, however, be mitigated as several buildings have secured anchor tenants.
Knight Frank says the impending opening of Nu Sentral later this year is expected to improve integration between the various completed components within KL Sentral and add further appeal to the transportation hub as a popular alternative office location, thus leading to improved demand and absorption rates in the medium to longer term.
With rapid developments of public transportation links (LRT extension and MRT lines), accessibility and connectivity between KL City and its fringe locations will be greatly enhanced. Coupled with the availability of good grade office space at competitive rental rates, this will accelerate the decentralisation process.
CBRE says some 6.27 million sq ft of new office space will be completed in the Greater KL region next year, although a considerable amount of this supply is located in strata-title or secondary buildings. Nevertheless, the market is set to remain poised in favour of tenants for the near future.
The KL city that constitutes the capital city’s golden triangle and central business district’s office market showed encouraging signs of life during the review quarter as vacancy rates fell to 12.7% (13.2% as at 1Q), on the back of some notable leasing activities.
Continued evidence of the ongoing flight to quality came in the form of an oil and gas major leasing over 200,000 sq ft of office space in Integra Tower, the recently completed prime office building within MGPA’s Intermark integrated development.
Overall, there was no change in average gross asking and passing rents for selected Grade A office space in the city, at RM8.10 psf and RM7.10 psf respectively.
As at the second quarter this year, the total supply of office space in Greater KL stood at about 91.1 million sq ft, 5% higher than the 89.2 million sq ft and up 5% year-on-year.
The second quarter of 2013 witnessed the completion of four developments, all located outside Kuala Lumpur city – Menara D’Damansara (253,000 sq ft of net lettable area), Plaza33 (530,840 sq ft), and Menara CIMB (609,000 sq ft) as well as Menara Shell (538,617 sq ft) located in KL Sentral.

Greater KL residential market expected to consolidate

THE Greater Kuala Lumpur residential property market is poised for some consolidation after recording breathtaking growth in terms of price hikes and transaction volume over the last three years, property consultants observe.
CBRE’s latest Greater Kuala Lumpur MarketView says a period of stabilisation is in order, with the period of significant growth in capital values seen since 2009 being replaced by an era of more gradual increases.
“The rapid growth in Kuala Lumpur and its suburbs has resulted in a scarcity in development land that drove up capital values for many areas in Selangor.
“About 75.7% of all residential units in Greater KL are located in Selangor, with the remaining 24% and 0.3% in Kuala Lumpur and Putrajaya respectively. Putrajaya, the country’s administrative capital, accounted for just over 4,740 units which are primarily for housing of civil servants,” the report adds.
New residential developments are being located further and further away from the city centre, with an increasing level of development seen in the southern portion of Greater KL, forming a growth corridor linking the city with Putrajaya/Cyberjaya and down to KLIA.
The CBRE report points out that previously overlooked areas, including Semenyih, are poised to see a marked increase in development activities in the near future.
As of quarter two (2Q) 2013, 196,092 units were classified as incoming supply, defined as units for which construction permits have been approved (whether or not construction has begun). Of this, 186,581 units were deemed to be under construction, implying that construction work has begun on 95.1% of the units with construction permits.
Total existing supply of residential properties stood at about 1.77 million units as at end-2Q 2013, with landed units accounting for 43.5% of total stock, non-landed properties made up 34.9% and low-cost housing was at 21.6%.
It notes that supply growth since end-2012 has been minimal at less than 1%, part of a wider slowdown in supply increase since 2006 that contributed to a rise in capital values in many areas of Greater KL since 2009.
Although the number of new starts has rebounded since 2011, it remained below levels seen during 2003 to 2007.
DTZ Nawawi Tie Leung executive director Brian Koh says that going forward, a slower but more sustainable growth in terms of new launches and take-up rate can be expected.
Koh says that in the last quarter of 2013, the things to look out for in the property market include a potential hike in bank interest rates as Bank Negara is expected to introduce further measures to rein in household debts. Higher borrowing rates may also affect mortgage loan rates that may mean higher borrowing cost to housebuyers.
“Buying interest from foreign buyers, especially from Singapore, Hong Kong, China and Japan could cushion the softer domestic demand going forward,” Koh observes.
Meanwhile, Knight Frank’s First Half 2013 Real Estate Highlights says while prices have flattened over the past 12 months as a result of government cooling measures, more activities are expected post-election as additional cooling measures implemented in competing Asian markets such as Singapore, Hong Kong and China, may lead to greater interest in the Kuala Lumpur, Penang and Iskandar Malaysia property markets.
“Malaysia is an attractive alternative investment destination due to its stable property market and relative housing affordability that offers reasonable returns in terms of capital appreciation/rental income.
“New launches featuring a good mix of unit sizing, particularly those located near high-level infrastructure projects, are expected to attract strong take-up as they appeal to a wider market of buyers and investors,” the Knight Frank report says.
In the luxurious condominium sector, CBRE estimates 6,484 units to be completed in Kuala Lumpur during the second half of 2013.
Of the 42,979 units of high-rise development (condominiums and serviced residences) in Kuala Lumpur valued at or above RM500 per sq ft (psf), it says about 35% are considered to be “luxury” (valued at RM800 psf and above).
Knight Frank says that with prices of high-end condominiums expected to remain flat for the remainder of this year, investors and purchasers will have the choice of opting for more bargain condominiums in the city and its immediate neighbourhood of Ampang Hilir/ U-Thant as the price per sq ft narrows between city and suburban living.