Overhang continued in 1H 2019

According to the National Property Information Centre (NAPIC), there were 32,810 residential overhang units worth RM19.76bil, an increase in volume of 1.5% whilst the value decreased by 0.5%.

43% overhang units were condominium and apartment,  bulk of the units priced between RM200,000 to RM300,000, mainly contributed by Perak.

In the 1H of 2019, the sector recorded 160,172 transactions worth RM68.3bil, representing a 6.9% increase in volume and 0.8% in value as compared to the 1H of 2018, which recorded 149,862 transactions worth RM67.74bil.

Residential property is 62.4% market share, followed by agriculture property with 21.6% share.

There were 99,922 transactions worth RM34.65bil recorded in H1’19, an increase of 6.1% in volume and 9.5% in value.

In the primary market, the number of new launches in H1’19 were far behind those recorded in the same period last year.

There were 23,591 units launched, contracted by 49.4% as compared to 46,617 units in H1’18.

For commercial property, there were 12,960 transactions worth RM12.53bil recorded in the 1H of the year, up 20.4% in volume but value declined by 20.8%.

The shop sub-sector dominated 53.4% of commercial property transactions and 46.3% of total value, recording 6,923 transactions worth RM5.8bil.

The shop sub-sector overhang continued to increase as well, recording a total of 5,760 units with a value of RM4.98bil, up 13.9% in volume and 22% in value against the preceding half.

The unsold under construction and not constructed scenario improved with volume decline by 11.9% to 6,370 units and 3.6% to 371 units respectively.

The Unsold Property Enquiry System Malaysia (UPESM 2.0) Malaysia was also launched in conjunction with the briefing.

Redevelopment must have consent of all owners

The National House Buyers Association (HBA) read with consternation recent articles in which the Federal Territories Minister said that the government is looking at an urban redevelopment/renewal law, while seeming to ignore the unconstitutional impact such a law will have on homeowners in Malaysia.

Little does he seem to realise the far reaching implications such a law will have on Article 13 of the Federal Constitution, and the principles of indefeasibility of title as enshrined in the National Land Code which the Federal Territories are bound by. We hope the FT Minister is not swayed by the whisperings of commercial-minded developers, hence this ‘mulling of a proposed law to govern redevelopment or renewal’.

En bloc strata sale

This ‘redevelopment or renewal’ law is likely another name for the impugned ‘En Bloc Strata (forced) sale’ proposal, first put forth by developers 10 years ago.

En bloc strata sale is where a certain piece of land with buildings erected on it is identified for acquisition by commercial developers. A developer will approach owners and persuade them to part with their property in consideration for, perhaps, the market rate of said property. Upon obtaining the land, the original buildings are demolished to make way for a new development, likely a mixed development with residential and commercial buildings priced high above the original rate of the demolished buildings.

Sans authoritative findings and conclusions, the original buildings are termed dilapidated or unsafe. The issue of certification by the Local Council as ‘condemned building’ thus arise and precede.

The aim as perceived by HBA is the forceful acquisition of certain commercially situated land area. Forceful, because an en bloc sale/redevelopment/renewal law only upholds the might of the majority. What about the constitutional rights of those who do not wish to dispose of their property even with considerable compensation because they have lived there their entire lives?

Less ‘pros’ and more ‘cons’

The FT Minister identified Singapore as an example where this law was enacted. Minority owners there were given replacement units on the renewed and redeveloped land itself and not in some far-off tertiary location. However, the success stories do not highlight the plight of the minority owners (who are often the old and infirm, who have stayed in the same area for decades) in coping with the forced hardship of adapting to new surroundings. Does the FT Minister actually care?

Singapore and Hong Kong are ranked as the world’s 3rd and 4th most densely populated countries respectively. Malaysia is ranked 112th, based on the projections of the United Nations in 2015. While en bloc sale is arguably a necessary evil in land-scarce Singapore and Hong Kong due to the pressing need for urban redevelopment, this argument is not relevant for Malaysia.

Land Acquisition Act

The Land Acquisition Act, which we now have, has prescribed reasons and procedures in place to ensure any forceful acquisition is undertaken with consideration of the interests and opinions of all the owners and not a mere majority. Reasons prescribed are confined to those for the ‘benefit of the public’ and not for commercial interests.

We also have the Strata Management Act 2013 (SMA) that provides for contributions by the owners to the Maintenance Account and the Sinking Fund Account in strata schemes so that strata buildings can be properly maintained, refurbished and upgraded without falling into dilapidation.

It is justified to redevelop strata developments for urban renewal using either the current Land Acquisition Act or the SMA which is in line with Article 13 of the Federal Constitution and section 340 of the National Land Code to protect the rights of homeowners rather than apply law more suited to countries that are land-scarce.

Being old is not a crime

Homeowners should have the freedom to decide how to redevelop their housing schemes without a law that allows the majority and third parties (commercial developers, government or political entities) to override the constitutional right of minority homeowners who may be old, infirm, have no living relatives or a voice. Older people often have difficulty adapting to living in a new place.

Does this proposed law envision the rights of the minority should the minority want to be compensated with a replacement home on the same site after redevelopment without having to pay for said unit, and that all expenses for temporary accommodation be borne by the developers?

There is no valid justification to support this proposal. HBA’s stand is that any redevelopment/rejuvenation/renewal must have the consent of all owners. Current laws are sufficient for renewing dilapidated buildings without sacrificing the interests of owners.

Datuk Chang Kim Loong is the Hon. Secretary-General of the National House Buyers Association (HBA). 
HBA can be contacted at: Email: info@hba.org.my
Website: www.hba.org.my 
Tel: +6012 334 5676

Watch Out As A Homebuyer

JMB and MC

The Strata Management Act 2013 has a built-in protection mechanism for strata unit owners – the key is to ensure that owners make it a point to participate in the decision-making with regards to any service charges or maintenance fees of the development as soon as possible.

Under normal circumstances, the developer has 1 year from the delivery of the first strata unit to purchaser to set up a JMB. The JMB consists of both strata unit owners and the developer (no strata title yet). Once strata titles have been issued, and 25% share units have been transferred to the owners, an MC (owners only) can then be formed. Once the MC is formed, the owners can then decide on the level of property maintenance and management they want and the fee they are willing to pay for them.

A book of strata register would have been opened during the JMB period. The only thing preventing the formation of an MC is the requirement that at least 25% of the aggregate share units be transferred to the owners. The problem is that there could be many owners who are unwilling to pay the stamp duty in the Memorandum of Transfer in order to obtain their strata title and hence the requirement to have a minimum of 25% of the aggregate share units transferred may not be achieved.

- EdgeProp.my

2018 Malaysia Quarterly Auction Statistic

Volume & Value Of Property Transaction By State

Be a buy-to-let investor

One of the most common forms of property investments is property leasing. The rent could mitigate or even offset the monthly instalment on the mortgage. Hence, leasing out a property is a good strategy while waiting for the property’s value to appreciate in future.

How much do Airbnb hosts make in Malaysia?

Cost Of Buying A Property

 

 

 

Real Estate Highlights for 2nd Half 2017

Kuala Lumpur’s (KL) total supply of high-end condominiums or residences stood at 49,678 units following the completion of 2,298 units in the second half of 2017 (2H17).

KL chalked up the most completions over the period, with 1,243 units (54.1%) from projects such as The Mews (256 units), The Manhattan (129 units), Tribeca Bukit Bintang (318 units), Dorsett Residences Bukit Bintang (252 units) and The Ritz-Carlton Residences (288 units).

A further three schemes offering a total 1,216 units will be slated for completion by 1H18, namely The Residences by Tropicana (353 units), Four Seasons Place (242 units) and Pavilion Hilltop (621 units).